Archive by Month: June 2013

Case Law E-Alert

Posted in Newsletters - 2013 on June 27, 2013

Today, in a 5 to 2 decision, the Florida Supreme Court issued its opinion in Nunez v. Geico General Ins. Co., Case No. SC12-650 (Fla., June 27, 2013), a case which was argued before the Court on December 4, 2012. This case was certified by the federal Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals, on the following certified question: “[w]hether, under FLA. STAT. § 627.736, an insurer can require an insured to attend an [examination under oath] as a condition precedent to recovery of [personal injury protection] benefits?” The Florida Supreme Court answered this question in the negative.

Read More

Quarterly Newsletter - Summer 2013

Posted in Newsletters - 2013 on June 17, 2013

In Ergas v. Universal Property and Casualty Ins. Co., 38 Fla. L. Weekly D900 (Fla. 4th DCA, April 24, 2013), the Fourth District Court of Appeal addressed the issue of whether a homeowner’s property insurance policy exclusion for “wear and tear, marring, deterioration” excluded coverage for the insureds’ claim for damage to their tile floor caused when an insured dropped a hammer on the floor, causing it to chip.  The insureds argued that the term “marring” was ambiguous because it was not defined in  the  policy  and  that,  in  the  context  of  the  exclusion,  the  term contemplated damage gradually occurring over time.   In response, Universal argued that none of the terms in the exclusion required interpretation by reference to the others.  The appellate court affirmed summary judgment in favor of the carrier, finding that the exclusion for “marring” applied to exclude coverage for the insureds’ claim.

Summer 2013 Newsletter 

Read More

WC E-Alert 6/6/2013

Posted in Newsletters - 2013 on June 6, 2013

Yesterday, in Jacobson v. Southeast Personnel Leasing, Inc., the First District Court of Appeal held that a statute prohibiting a claimant from hiring a lawyer on an hourly fee to defend him against a motion to tax costs is unconstitutional. The claimant sustained a compensable industrial accident on September 4, 2007, injuring his neck and back. He underwent a cervical fusion, and then doctors recommended another surgery to repair a herniated cervical disc. The JCC denied both the claim for continued compensability of the low back as well as for PTD benefits. The employer/carrier then filed a motion to tax prevailing party costs against the claimant.


Read More