Posted in Newsletters - 2014 on December 4, 2014
On December 4, 2014, the Florida Supreme Court issued its opinion in Morales v. Zenith Ins. Co., Case No. SC13-696, a case certified to the Court by the federal Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals. In Morales, Santana Morales, Jr. was crushed to death by a palm tree while working for his employer Lawns Nursery. His widow settled his workers' compensation claim with Lawns and its workers' compensation/employers’ liability insurance carrier, Zenith. The settlement contained a release expressly electing workers' compensation as Morales' sole remedy under the Zenith policy. Read More
Posted in Newsletters - 2014 on November 25, 2014
Michael Wilensky and Elizabeth Izquierdo recently won summary judgment in favor of a landowner in a premises liability action involving a decedent who stepped on a skylight while painting a warehouse and fell to his death. The decedent was an employee of an independent contractor hired to paint the roof of a warehouse owned by the defendant. The plaintiff alleged that the owner negligently failed to maintain its premises or allowed a dangerous condition to exist on the premises, or negligently failed to warn the decedent that the skylight would not support his weight. The court granted summary judgment in favor of the owner, finding that as a general rule an owner of property is not liable for injuries sustained by the employees of an independent contractor while performing work on the premises. The court further found that the exceptions to that general rule did not apply because the evidence established that the decedent was repeatedly warned about the danger of stepping on the skylight, and because the owner did not actively control the work of the decedent. The Plaintiff attempted to rely on an affidavit of George Zimmerman to argue that code violations existed on the property. The Court struck Mr. Zimmerman's affidavit, and found that an alleged code violation could not create a duty where none existed at common law. Read More
Posted in Newsletters - 2014 on October 7, 2014
Cristobal Casal and Diane Tutt, Associates in our Hollywood office, obtained final summary judgment on October 6, 2014 in favor of Defendant, Up & Down Equipment Rental Inc. in the case of The Estate of Manual Juarez v. Florida Power & Light Co., et al., a wrongful death lawsuit filed in the Eleventh Judicial Circuit, Case No. 11-20553 CA 20, before Judge Ronald Dresnick in Miami, Florida. Manual Juarez was electrocuted while working as a painter on an elevated scaffold, or swing stage, rented to the contractor by our client, Up & Down Equipment Rental. Mr. Juarez's metal paint roller pole came in contact with a live electric line while he was working near the top of an apartment building in Miami Beach. The decedent's personal representative sued a number of defendants including our client, which was sued for negligence, negligent entrustment and vicarious liability under the dangerous instrumentality doctrine.
E-Alert_10-07-14.pdf Read More
Posted in Newsletters - 2014 on September 26, 2014
John Howard obtained a defense verdict in the case of Radosevich v. Dreamstar Custom Homes, Inc. Originally, the case involved issues of negligence, fraud, and breach of contract with regard to the construction of an equestrian estate in Wellington, FL. The case was bifurcated by the court so that the negligence portion of the trial could be tried separately from the breach of contract and fraud claims. In the negligence case the Plaintiff alleged that within 2-3 days of moving into the new equestrian estate, her prize-winning thoroughbred horse, a grandson of Secretariat, stepped on a piece of construction debris that had been negligently discarded by Dreamstar, which caused an abscess in the right front hoof, caused the horse to founder, and led to the ultimate demise of the horse by euthanasia in February 2009. The Defense argued that the actual cause of the horse's injury and ultimate death was unknown and that there was no evidence that the horse stepped on construction debris, as opposed to any other object on the ground. A Motion for Summary Judgment and Motion for Directed Verdict were denied by the Court, which held that the evidence was sufficient for the jury to draw an inference that the horse stepped on construction debris, which was the proximate cause of the horse's injury. After deliberating for 45 minutes, the jury returned a defense verdict, finding that the Defendant was not negligent.
Posted in Newsletters - 2014 on September 12, 2014
Edward Winitz, Partner and Scott Wachholder, Associate in our Hollywood office, obtained a defense verdict from a jury trial in a personal injury protection (PIP) case. The issue was the medical necessity of a cervical spine MRI performed by the Plaintiff, MRI facility. The claimant first sought treatment from a chiropractor 98 days post accident. The chiropractor treated the claimant for 31 office visits before ordering the MRI, and 15 office visits after the MRI, despite the medical records indicating that the claimant was improving and stopped complaining of neck pain.
E-Alert_09-12-14.pdf Read More