Conroy Simberg Named to 2025 "Best Law Firms"
List by U.S. News - Best Lawyers®
Premier Civil Defense Firm
Conroy Simberg is a full-service civil defense law firm committed to providing outstanding representation and personalized legal services to each of our clients.
We have built a strong reputation for delivering skilled and experienced legal counsel to insurance companies, businesses, professionals and self-insured organizations. Our solution-oriented attorneys understand the financial pressures that our clients face and focus on creating strategies and solutions to resolve their cases in the quickest and most efficient manner. When a settlement cannot be achieved, our attorneys aggressively represent clients at all stages of the litigation process.
Over Four DecadesOf Services
History
Founded by Tom Conroy and Bruce Simberg in 1979, Conroy Simberg has grown to a firm with over 150 attorneys practicing in 11 offices located throughout the State of Florida and in Thomasville, Georgia. We have focused on expanding our firm by developing highly qualified partners and associates that broaden our areas of expertise.
Longevity
For more than 45 years, Conroy Simberg has established itself as a full-service civil defense firm, proudly serving the legal needs of insurance companies, self-insureds, and other related entities. Clients choose our firm because they value our longevity, loyalty, and outstanding legal results.
Diversity
Conroy Simberg is committed to increasing diversity and inclusion at all levels within the firm regardless of race, ethnicity, age, gender, religion, sexual orientation, gender identity, disability, economic status, and or other diverse backgrounds so that the firm will reflect the demographics of our clients.
Recent news & Events
Final Summary Judgment Obtained In First-Party Property Insurance Case
Hinda Klein, Elliott Tubbs and Megan Powell recently obtained final summary judgment in a first-party property insurance case in Palm Beach County, Florida. Plaintiff filed his lawsuit against Defendant over one year past the applicable statute of limitations. Defendant filed a Motion For Summary Judgment. Plaintiff opposed the motion and claimed multiple estoppel issues. The Court granted the Defendant’s Motion For Summary Judgment because it agreed that the lawsuit was not timely filed. The Court rejected the Plaintiff’s arguments that Defendant failed to comply with certain notice duties and that Defendant’s actions and inactions extended the deadline to file the lawsuit.
Read More