SimbergKrevansAbelKraftKleinGoldberg
Conroy Simberg Named to 2025 "Best Law Firms"
List by U.S. News - Best Lawyers®
Conroy Simberg is a full-service civil defense law firm committed to providing outstanding representation and personalized legal services to each of our clients.
We have built a strong reputation for delivering skilled and experienced legal counsel to insurance companies, businesses, professionals and self-insured organizations. Our solution-oriented attorneys understand the financial pressures that our clients face and focus on creating strategies and solutions to resolve their cases in the quickest and most efficient manner. When a settlement cannot be achieved, our attorneys aggressively represent clients at all stages of the litigation process.
Founded by Tom Conroy and Bruce Simberg in 1979, Conroy Simberg has grown to a firm with over 150 attorneys practicing in 11 offices located throughout the State of Florida and in Thomasville, Georgia. We have focused on expanding our firm by developing highly qualified partners and associates that broaden our areas of expertise.
For more than 40 years, Conroy Simberg has established itself as a full-service civil defense firm, proudly serving the legal needs of insurance companies, self-insureds, and other related entities. Clients choose our firm because they value our longevity, loyalty, and outstanding legal results.
Conroy Simberg is committed to increasing diversity and inclusion at all levels within the firm regardless of race, ethnicity, age, gender, religion, sexual orientation, gender identity, disability, economic status, and or other diverse backgrounds so that the firm will reflect the demographics of our clients.
Partner Rebecca Williams and Appellate Partner, Diane Tutt recently prevailed on a motion for summary judgment in a IP trademark case. The case involved a false advertising claim under the Federal Lanham Act, contributory false advertising, and a claim under the Florida Deceptive and Unfair Trade Practices Act (FDUTPA). Plaintiff was claiming that two (2) advertising documents disseminated by codefendant which we played a role in contributing to and which included our logo and company name, and for which Plaintiff was claiming joint and several liability, were literally false, false by necessary implication or misleading in violation of the Lanham Act and FDUTPA. Under the Lanham Act, Plaintiff just has to prove that the Defendants had gross revenues and then the burden is on the Defendants to prove all deductions, including all costs of sales, allocable expenses, and other factors besides the allegedly false advertising that caused the Defendants' increase in revenues. As such, Plaintiff was seeking disgorgement of all of profits allegedly attributable to the false advertising of tens of millions of dollars.
Read More