Posted in Verdicts and Settlements on April 28, 2025
Partner Rebecca Williams and Appellate Partner, Diane Tutt recently prevailed on a motion for summary judgment in a IP trademark case. The case involved a false advertising claim under the Federal Lanham Act, contributory false advertising, and a claim under the Florida Deceptive and Unfair Trade Practices Act (FDUTPA). Plaintiff was claiming that two (2) advertising documents disseminated by codefendant which we played a role in contributing to and which included our logo and company name, and for which Plaintiff was claiming joint and several liability, were literally false, false by necessary implication or misleading in violation of the Lanham Act and FDUTPA. Under the Lanham Act, Plaintiff just has to prove that the Defendants had gross revenues and then the burden is on the Defendants to prove all deductions, including all costs of sales, allocable expenses, and other factors besides the allegedly false advertising that caused the Defendants' increase in revenues. As such, Plaintiff was seeking disgorgement of all of profits allegedly attributable to the false advertising of tens of millions of dollars.
Read More
Posted in Verdicts and Settlements on March 26, 2025
Thomasville, GA managing partner, Joshua C. Canton, and partner, Justin B. Hales, won a defense verdict in a Chatham County, GA case where plaintiffs alleged causes of action for trespass, nuisance, negligence, attorney’s fees, and punitive damages. Plaintiffs contended that the defendant failed to maintain her property and caused dead or dying trees to fall onto Plaintiffs’ property over a period of five years, destroying structures and endangering lives. Plaintiffs also argued that the defendant maintained raccoons and rats on her property inside of a dilapidated house and caused the creatures to invade the plaintiffs’ property attacking the plaintiffs and their pets. Defendant contended that the suit was merely a pre-text for Plaintiffs to obtain the Defendant’s waterfront property. After a four day trial, Plaintiffs asked the jury to award $500,000 plus punitive damages and attorney’s fees. The jury returned a defense verdict in less than 90 minutes.
Read More
Posted in Verdicts and Settlements on March 17, 2025
Noelia C. Vaccaro, an attorney in the Hollywood office, and Maria S. Chapman, an attorney in the Tampa office, recently prevailed on a motion to dismiss in an Assignment of Benefits (AOB) case in Escambia County, in which the Court granted the Defendant's Motion to Dismiss with prejudice. The court ruled that the Plaintiff's AOB was invalid under Florida Statute § 627.7152 because it lacked a written, itemized, per-unit cost estimate of services to be performed — a statutory requirement for AOB validity. The court further determined that the deficiency in the AOB was an issue of standing that could not be remedied through amendment. Consequently, the Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint was dismissed.
Read More
Posted in Verdicts and Settlements on February 25, 2025
Hollywood partners Tom McCausland and Josh Nathanson, along with Amy Klotz, an appellate/litigation support attorney, secured a favorable result on an admitted liability motor vehicle accident. Our client was driving a box truck and reversed into the Plaintiff’s vehicle. Plaintiff waited twelve days to receive any treatment and then was involved in a second motor vehicle accident the day after his first appointment. He claimed neck and back injuries from the first accident and knee and shoulder injuries from the second accident. The judge granted a directed verdict on permanency and future medical bills. Opposing counsel asked the jury to award past medical bills in the amount of $120,000. The jury awarded $2,725, which should be reduced to zero.
Read More
Posted in Verdicts and Settlements on February 21, 2025
Joshua C. Canton, managing partner of the firm's Tallahassee, Florida office, along with Justin B. Hales, a partner in the firm’s Tallahassee, Florida office, recently prevailed on a motion for summary judgment in a case where the Plaintiff was physically battered by another employee by arguing the employer Defendant was immune from prosecution based on worker’s compensation immunity.
Read More