News & Events

Ryan W. Royce, an associate in the firm’s Tampa office, prevailed on a motion for summary judgment in a declaratory judgment action brought by Plaintiff against a condominium association (“Association”) after its board had voted for the removal of the onsite sewer system and construction of a new sewer lift station to be able to connect to county sewer lines.  The Plaintiff objected to construction of the new sewer lift station and filed a declaratory judgment action seeking a determination that a majority unit owner vote was required and that the granting of an easement in favor of the county should be deemed void as a matter of law.  In our motion for summary judgment, we successfully argued that although an easement is a real property interest in land, it is a right distinct from ownership of the land itself and does not confer title to the land on which the easement is imposed. Further, because an easement is a right of use and does not transfer title, the Association had the power to grant sewer related easements to the County without a unit owner vote. The trial court agreed with the defense and granted final summary judgment for the defendant. The defendant is now pursuing recovery of its attorney’s fees and costs. 

Miles McGrane, IV, a partner in the firm’s Hollywood office, along with Aaron Zeilberger, an associate in the firm’s Orlando office, obtained a defense verdict on behalf of a trucking company and its driver in a personal injury case after a five day jury trial in Lake County, Florida. The case was bifurcated and this trial was on liability only. The jury deliberated for thirty minutes before returning with their verdict.

Seth Goldberg, a partner in the firm’s Hollywood office, along with Samuel Spinner, an associate in the firm’s appellate department, recently prevailed on a motion for summary judgment in a slip-and-fall case involving a transitory foreign substance. The plaintiff testified that she did not see the liquid before she fell, did not know how long it was on the floor, and did not know how it got on the floor. The defense moved for summary judgment, arguing the plaintiff could not meet her burden to prove that the business owner had actual or constructive knowledge of the substance before the accident as required by Florida Statute section 768.0755. The plaintiff argued that the defendant must have known of the substance because there was an employee in the area where she fell. The trial court rejected this argument, agreeing with the defense that there was no evidence the employee spilled the liquid on the floor or knew about it before the accident. Therefore, the trial court granted final summary judgment for the defendant.

Rod Lundy, a partner, and Tylar Heintz, an associate, both of our Orlando office, secured a favorable verdict in Orange County, Florida following a 7 day trial.

Conroy Simberg's Hinda Klein obtains a reversal of a trial court‘s award of attorney fees in a PIP suit filed over pennies of interest.On August 17, the Fourth District Court of Appeal issued its opinion in Liberty Mutual Insurance Company v. PAN AM Diagnostic Services Inc. d/b/a PAN AM Diagnostic of Orlando a/a/o Claudine Jean, 4D21-2156, (Fla. 4th DCA 2022), reversing an attorney fee award of $24,028.27 in a suit filed over $0.14 cents of statutory interest.