News & Events

On November 6, 2024, Joshua Canton, Managing Partner of the firm’s Tallahassee office, and Mattie Birster, an associate in the firm’s Tallahassee office, obtained a defense verdict in trucking case in the U.S District Court for Northern Florida that involved claims of tortious interference with a business relationship and defamation following a two-day jury trial. Plaintiff, a trucker, claimed that the defendant, a common carrier, falsely reported to the DOT that plaintiff refused to submit to a random drug test and asked for $700,000 and punitive damages. Defendant argued that Plaintiff had in fact refused to submit to a drug test under the applicable regulations and that the report to the DOT was truthful. The case turned on how various regulations of the FMCSA applied to the facts of the case.  The jury returned a defense verdict in an hour and a half. 

Jacksonville, partner John Viggiani and attorney Jeffrey A. Yarbrough, prevailed on a motion for summary judgment in a negligent security case in Duval County, Florida. 

Cris Casal and Yasmine Kirollos, partners in the Fort Myers office, obtained a defense verdict in a trip and fall case in Sarasota County where they represented a general contractor. The Plaintiff alleged that she was unable to perceive a step in a recently built walkway because it was not painted yellow which caused her to trip over it on her way into the building. Plaintiff alleged that the shade pattern from the landscaping in the area combined with the lack of contrast between the step and the rest of the walkway made it a dangerous condition.  Six weeks before the accident, Plaintiff had undergone a partial right knee replacement. She claimed that her partial knee implant loosened as a result of the fall and necessitated revision total knee surgery.

Fort Myers managing partner, Cristobal Casal, and attorneys Holly Paar and Piero Sotomayor recently prevailed on a Motion for Summary Judgment in which Defendant argued that Plaintiffs’ Notice of Intent to Initiate Litigation failed to comply with Florida Statute 627.70152  The Court agreed that Plaintiffs’ failure to specify and itemize their damages, attorneys’ fees, and costs and include a disputed amount as required by the statute meant that Plaintiffs failed to comply with a condition precedent prior to filing their lawsuit. 

Noelia C. Vaccaro recently prevailed on a motion to dismiss in an AOB case in Hillsborough County, in which the Plaintiff filed a breach of contract based on an alleged assignment of post-loss benefits (AOB) executed by the insured on February 10, 2021. The AOB is governed by section 627.7152, Florida Statutes, which requires all assignment agreements executed on or after July 1, 2019, to include specific elements for validity. Defendant argued the AOB did not comply with the statute because it lacked a written, itemized, per-unit cost estimate of the services to be performed, attaching only invoices for services already completed. The Court agreed with the Defendant, finding that the AOB was invalid and unenforceable because it did not include the required itemized cost estimate for future services, per section 627.7152(2)(a)4.