May 5, 2025 | Verdicts and Settlements

Georgia Attorneys Secure Summary Judgment in a Wrongful Death Case

Thomasville, GA managing partner, Joshua C. Canton, and partner, Justin B. Hales, recently won summary judgment in a wrongful death case following a coverage dispute regarding uninsured/underinsured motorist coverage where there was not a notice of nonrenewal letter provided by the insurance carrier. The Court ruled that O.C.G.A. §33-24-45(3) which requires written notice before refusing to renew coverage, did not apply in this case because the evidence reflected that the uninsured/underinsured insurance carrier was willing to renew the policy with the Plaintiff’s employer who chose not to renew the policy and failed to pay the premium which rendered the policy not in effect on the date of loss.

May 1, 2025 | Verdicts and Settlements

Hollywood Partners Obtain Favorable Verdict in Premises Liability Case

Tom McCausland and Sam Kugbei, partners in the Hollywood office, recently secured a favorable verdict in a premises liability case tried in Key West, FL. They represented a restaurant sued by a Rhode Island resident who claimed she tripped and fell while stepping off an elevated wooden platform sometimes used as a live performance stage. As a result of the fall, Plaintiff fractured her right foot. She underwent three surgeries and multiple rounds of physical therapy. She claimed that, despite years of treatment, she continued to experience chronic pain.

April 28, 2025 | Verdicts and Settlements

Favorable Verdict Secured in IP Trademark Litigation Case

Partner Rebecca Williams and Appellate Partner, Diane Tutt recently prevailed on a motion for summary judgment in a IP trademark case. The case involved a false advertising claim under the Federal Lanham Act, contributory false advertising, and a claim under the Florida Deceptive and Unfair Trade Practices Act (FDUTPA).  Plaintiff was claiming that two (2) advertising documents disseminated by codefendant which we played a role in contributing to and which included our logo and company name, and for which Plaintiff was claiming joint and several liability, were literally false, false by necessary implication or misleading in violation of the Lanham Act and FDUTPA.  Under the Lanham Act, Plaintiff just has to prove that the Defendants had gross revenues and then the burden is on the Defendants to prove all deductions, including all costs of sales, allocable expenses, and other factors besides the allegedly false advertising that caused the Defendants' increase in revenues.  As such, Plaintiff was seeking disgorgement of all of profits allegedly attributable to the false advertising of tens of millions of dollars.   

April 8, 2025 | Announcements

Miles A. McGrane, IV Appointed Chair of Local Professionalism Panel

Miles A. McGrane, IV, a Partner in our Hollywood Office, has recently been appointed by the Chief Judge of the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, to serve as Chair of the Local Professionalism Panel.  In 2023, the Florida Supreme Court adopted the Code for Resolving Professionalism Referrals and directed the Chief Judge of each circuit to create a local professionalism panel.  The purpose of the Panel is to informally resolve referrals of claimed unprofessional conduct by lawyers practicing in the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit. The Panel is to promote adherence to the Standards of Professionalism and to receive, screen, and act upon referrals of unprofessional conduct; and address those referrals informally, if possible, or refer those referrals to The Florida Bar for investigation.

March 26, 2025 | Verdicts and Settlements

Attorneys Secure Defense Verdict in Georgia Property Dispute Case

Thomasville, GA managing partner, Joshua C. Canton, and partner, Justin B. Hales, won a defense verdict in a Chatham County, GA case where plaintiffs alleged causes of action for trespass, nuisance, negligence, attorney’s fees, and punitive damages.  Plaintiffs contended that the defendant failed to maintain her property and caused dead or dying trees to fall onto Plaintiffs’ property over a period of five years, destroying structures and endangering lives.  Plaintiffs also argued that the defendant maintained raccoons and rats on her property inside of a dilapidated house and caused the creatures to invade the plaintiffs’ property attacking the plaintiffs and their pets.  Defendant contended that the suit was merely a pre-text for Plaintiffs to obtain the Defendant’s waterfront property.  After a four day trial, Plaintiffs asked the jury to award $500,000 plus punitive damages and attorney’s fees.  The jury returned a defense verdict in less than 90 minutes.