August 22, 2022 | Verdicts and Settlements

Reversal of Attorney’s Fee Award In PIP Case Involving Claim of $.14 In Interest

Conroy Simberg's Hinda Klein obtains a reversal of a trial court‘s award of attorney fees in a PIP suit filed over pennies of interest.On August 17, the Fourth District Court of Appeal issued its opinion in Liberty Mutual Insurance Company v. PAN AM Diagnostic Services Inc. d/b/a PAN AM Diagnostic of Orlando a/a/o Claudine Jean, 4D21-2156, (Fla. 4th DCA 2022), reversing an attorney fee award of $24,028.27 in a suit filed over $0.14 cents of statutory interest.

August 15, 2022 | Verdicts and Settlements

Summary Judgment in Wrongful Death Case Obtained

Dale L. Friedman, a partner in the firm’s Hollywood Office, and Diane H. Tutt, an appellate partner in the firm’s Hollywood Office, recently obtained summary judgment in a wrongful death case brought by the personal representative (mother) of an intellectually disabled adult who was residing in a group home and was struck and killed by a vehicle as he walked across a roadway to get a snack.  The Plaintiff was represented by a very well respected personal injury law firm in Palm Beach. 

August 10, 2022 | Legal Alerts

Florida's Senate Bills 2D and 4D Signed into Law: What It Means for Insurers

Florida has been known as one of the most difficult states for insurance companies to do business in. However, recently, Governor Ron DeSantis signed two important bills, Senate Bills 2D and 4D, into law that will change how insurance companies do business in Florida and the legal climate they may face. Given that the new laws take aim at some of the worst abuses propagated by plaintiffs’ lawyers, they can be thought of as consumer-friendly.

August 8, 2022 | Verdicts and Settlements

Motion for Summary Judgment Granted in Hurricane Irma Case

Noelia Vaccaro, an associate in the firm’s first party property & coverage practice, prevailed on a motion for summary judgment on a first-party property claim that was originally reported as a loss caused by a faulty sprinkler head. Several years later, and in the middle of the case, the plaintiffs changed the cause of loss to Hurricane Irma. The trial court granted final summary judgment for the defense, finding that the evidence showed that Hurricane Irma did not create an opening in the property’s exterior walls that allowed for interior water intrusion.